fixes issue described in https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/12579

In #24065 explicit generic parameter matching was made to fail matches
on arguments with unresolved types in generic contexts (the sigmatch
diff, following #24010), similar to what is done for regular calls since
#22029. However unlike regular calls, a failed match in a generic
context for a standalone explicit generic instantiation did not convert
the expression into one with `tyFromExpr` type, which means it would
error immediately given any unresolved parameter. This is now done to
fix the issue.

For explicit generic instantiations on single non-overloaded symbols, a
successful match is still instantiated. For multiple overloads (i.e.
symchoice), if any of the overloads fail the match, the entire
expression is considered untyped and any instantiations are not used, so
as to not void overloads that would match later. This means even
symchoices without unresolved arguments aren't instantiated, which may
be too restrictive, but it could also be too lenient and we might need
to make symchoice instantiations always untyped. The behavior for
symchoice is not sound anyway given it causes #9997 so this is something
to consider for a redesign.

Diff follows #24276.

refs #8064, refs #24010

Error messages for standalone explicit generic instantiations are
revamped. Failing standalone explicit generic instantiations now only
error after overloading has finished and resolved to the default `[]`
magic (this means `[]` can now be overloaded for procs but this isn't
necessarily intentional, in #24010 it was documented that it isn't
possible). The error messages for failed instantiations are also no
longer a simple `cannot instantiate: foo` message, instead they now give
the same type mismatch error message as overloads with mismatching
explicit generic parameters.

This is now possible due to the changes in #24010 that delegate all
explicit generic proc instantiations to overload resolution. Old code
that worked around this is now removed. `maybeInstantiateGeneric` could
maybe also be removed in favor of just `explicitGenericSym`, the `result
== n` case is due to `explicitGenericInstError` which is only for niche
cases.

Also, to cause "ambiguous identifier" error messages when the explicit
instantiation is a symchoice and the expression context doesn't allow
symchoices, we semcheck the sym/symchoice created by
`explicitGenericSym` with the given expression flags.

#8064 isn't entirely fixed because the error message is still misleading
for the original case which does `values[1]`, as a consequence of
#12664.

(cherry picked from commit 0a058a6)

fixes issue described in https://forum.nim-lang.org/t/12579

In #24065 explicit generic parameter matching was made to fail matches
on arguments with unresolved types in generic contexts (the sigmatch
diff, following #24010), similar to what is done for regular calls since
#22029. However unlike regular calls, a failed match in a generic
context for a standalone explicit generic instantiation did not convert
the expression into one with `tyFromExpr` type, which means it would
error immediately given any unresolved parameter. This is now done to
fix the issue.

For explicit generic instantiations on single non-overloaded symbols, a
successful match is still instantiated. For multiple overloads (i.e.
symchoice), if any of the overloads fail the match, the entire
expression is considered untyped and any instantiations are not used, so
as to not void overloads that would match later. This means even
symchoices without unresolved arguments aren't instantiated, which may
be too restrictive, but it could also be too lenient and we might need
to make symchoice instantiations always untyped. The behavior for
symchoice is not sound anyway given it causes #9997 so this is something
to consider for a redesign.

Diff follows #24276.

(cherry picked from commit 67ad1ae)